Seeds of Greatness Ministries Inc
PO Box 756
New Castle, DE 19720
Talking Points
Experience Mod Rating
Mod is an indication of how risky a company is to insure. It is based on a company's claim history.
- Experience Mod ishigh. It is in the 100th percentile compared to peers.
- Moddecreasedby more than 75% of peers.
LCM Rate
对WC成本LCMs有最大的影响。车riers file LCM's which are multiplied with the state approved Loss Costs for your employment classifications to create your policy rates. Carrier Groups have several Carrier Tier's each with their own filing, allowing their underwriters to price aggressively to overly prudent depending on the risk.
- The LCM of the Current Carrier isHigherthan 89% of peers.
- Shopping around for a carrier that would provide a more competative tier would make sense.
Market Competitiveness
We measure relative change (when a business chooses a different WC provider), and market share distribution over a rolling 24 months as compared to it's industry and state level activity to determine how competitive carriers are for your class of business.
- 15% of peers have changed carriers since last year.
- 当前运营商的市场份额在1st percentile at 7.7% of the market.
Business Stats
Policy History
Term | Exp. Mod | 车rier | LCM |
---|---|---|---|
2022 |
2.112 | ||
2021 |
2.112 | ||
2020 |
2.112 | ||
2019 |
2.112 | ||
2018 |
2.112 | ||
2017 |
1.919 | ||
2016 |
1.919 | ||
2015 05-07-2014 |
1.227 | ||
2015 |
1.822 | ||
2014 |
- | ||
2013 |
- | ||
2012 |
- | ||
2011 |
- | ||
2010 |
- | ||
2009 |
- |
Contacts
Industry Classification
Church
Religious Organizations
Churches or Other Houses of Worship
41680
Convents or Monasteries
Retirement Benefits
Financials
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOY Assets: | $ 259,490 | $ 209,778 | $ 442,729 | $ 289,500 | $ 948,523 | $ 88,447 | $ 24,534 | $ 84,132 | $ 10,659 | $ 71,576 | $ 6,683 |
Liabilities: | $ 0 | $ 4 | $ 890 | $ 0 | $ 3 | $ 20 | |||||
EE Contrib: | $ 62,043 | $ 61,945 | $ 99,117 | $ 58,509 | $ 99,655 | $ 48,273 | $ 55,800 | $ 40,603 | $ 66,110 | $ 94,043 | $ 50,063 |
Emp Contrib: | $ 0 | $ 1 | $ 1 | $ 11 | $ 26 | $ 1 | $ 6 | $ 1 | $ 0 | ||
Income/Loss: | $ 37,593 | $ 83,141 | ($ 75,052) | $ 21,302 | $ 6,295 | ($ 7,561) | $ 1,166 | $ 7,024 | $ 756 | ($ 217) | $ 7,601 |
Total Income: | $ 99,636 | $ 38,097 | $ 14,449 | $ 40,190 | $ 29,594 | $ 45,684 | $ 77,757 | $ 83,308 | $ 55,884 | $ 45,290 | $ 1,879 |
Paid Benefits: | $ 756 | $ 98,218 | $ 8 | $ 8 | $ 6,785 | $ 8 | $ 2 | $ 4,406 | |||
Expenses: | $ 0 | $ 946 | $ 6 | $ 24 | $ 45 | $ 8 | $ 666 | ||||
Commission: | $ 30 | $ 60 | $ 9 | $ 3 | $ 47 | $ 6 | $ 9 | $ 27 | $ 74 | $ 134 | |
Net Income: | $ 98,850 | $ 25,652 | $ 93,961 | $ 46,756 | $ 44,770 | $ 65,217 | $ 74,707 | $ 75,421 | $ 86,700 | $ 4,550 | $ 78,168 |
Net Assets: | $ 358,340 | $ 159,789 | $ 642,849 | $ 71,306 | $ 602,675 | $ 885,536 | $ 6,745 | $ 71,163 | $ 91,008 | $ 21,929 | $ 90,181 |
Participants
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Participants: | 80 | 67 | 03 | 99 | 97 | 06 | 57 | 24 | 96 | 67 | 62 |
Active Part.: | 61 | 52 | 95 | 70 | 92 | 16 | 29 | dd1 | ea | e2 | 0d1 |
Retired Part.: | 1 | 4e | c | 48 | ea | 4f | e | 0 | a3 | dbe | |
Deceased Part.: | b | 0 | 17 | b73 | 90 | 4 | 8 | 83 | b | be |
Insurance
No Insurance CoverageProviders
No ProvidersFeatures
2A- Age/Service Weighted or new comparability or similar plan - Age/Service Weighted Plan: Allocations are based on age, service, or age and service. New comparability or similar plan: Allocations are based on participant classifications and a classification(s) consists entirely or predominantly of highly compensated employees; or the plan provides an additional allocation rate on compensation above a specified threshold, and the theshold or additional rate exceeds the maximum threshold or rate allowed under the permitted disparity rules of section 401(l).
2E- Profit-sharing
2F- ERISA section 404(c) Plan - This plan, or any part of it is intended to meet the conditions of 29 CFR 2550.404c-1.
2G- Total participant-directed account plan - Participants have the opportunity to direct the investment of all the assets allocated to their individual accounts, regardless of whether 29 CFR 2550.404c-1 is intended to be met.
2J- Code section 401(k) feature - A cash or deferred arrangement described in Code section 401(k) that is part of a qualified defined contribution plan that provides for an election by employees to defer part of their compensation or receive these amounts in cash.
2S- Plan provides for automatic enrollment in plan that has employee contributions deducted from payroll.
2T- Total or partial participant-directed account plan - plan uses default investment account for participants who fail to direct assets in their account.
3D- Pre-approved pension plan - A master, prototype, or volume submitter plan that is the subject of a favorable opinion or advisory letter from the IRS.